1 note
Michael O’Leary at the Innovation Convention 2011 - Brussels (by InnovationUnion)
by Matt Ridley
Even so, the generation of new useful knowledge is far from uniform, steady, or continuous. Innovation is like a bush fire that burns brightly for a short time, then dies down before flaring up somewhere else. Fifty thousand years ago, the hottest hot spot was west Asia (ovens, bows and arrows); 10,000 years ago, the Fertile Crescent (farming, pottery); 5,000 years ago, Mesopotamia (metal, cities); 2,000 years ago, India (textiles, zero); 1,000 years ago, China (porcelain, printing); 500 years ago, Italy (double-entry bookkeeping, Leonardo); 400 years ago, the Low Countries (the Amsterdam Exchange Bank); 300 years ago, France (Canal du Midi); 200 years ago, England (steam); 100 years ago, Germany (fertilizer); 75 years ago, America (mass production); 50 years ago, California (credit card); 25 years ago, Japan (Walkman). No place remains for long the leader in knowledge creation.
A must read!
Johanna Blakely details the lack of copyright protection that has helped to shape a remarkably innovative fashion industry. This is an important lecture that should be watched by anyone interested in the intellectual property debate.
Nice talk but there are some problems. I take the pharmaceutical industry as an example.
Development cycles. The fashion industry generates thousands of ideas every year. You doesn’t need much overhead in form of machines, working spaces etc.. The development cycles are very short. Make design. Produce it.
The pharmaceutical industry has a very long development cycle. It’s about 20 years per product. You need a lot of researchers, labs and materials.
Trend cycle. There are at least four trends per year for the fashion industry. The latest summer fashion, winter fashion, spring fashion and of course autumn fashion. That is, each fashions should be in vouge for about three months.
Finally, the bar chart is kind of nonsense. 
You see the sales of some goods in billion USD. Top three are food, automobiles and fashion. The bottom three are films, books and music. Seriously. How often needs someone food, clothes or an automobile compared to films, music and books?